From: nattyreb@ix.netcom.com
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 02:38:47
Subject: !*Malcolm X Item May Not Be Sold 

FORWARDED MESSAGE
====================

From: "Walter Lippmann" 
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 08:35:03 -0700

Thursday, May 20, 1999
Malcolm X Item May Not Be Sold
 Investigation: Auction house says it will return the address book to black
leader's family if it is determined it was stolen.
By ANNE-MARIE O'CONNOR, Times Staff Writer

    The bullet-pierced, bloodstained address book of Malcolm X, scheduled to
be displayed by a prestigious auction house in Los Angeles on Friday, will
be withdrawn from a May 27 sale if there is compelling evidence that it was
stolen, a spokesman said.

     The decision by Butterfield & Butterfield comes amid a heated
controversy over how a private collector got the book that was in the black
leader's pocket when he was gunned down by assassins 34 years ago.

    Levy Morgan, a spokesman for Butterfield & Butterfield, said the New
York City counsel's office has told his company it has evidence it was
stolen. Calls to that office were not returned.

  "If those reports are true, obviously we would never offer something at
auction that was not the property of our consigner," Morgan said, adding
that a decision could come today.

     Joseph Fleming, the lawyer representing the estate of Malcolm X's
deceased widow, said that he will file an injunction to enjoin the sale,
which is to take place in San Francisco on May 27, if he does not received
assurance today that the book will be withdrawn.

    Fleming said Malcolm X's six daughters are "appalled that this item,
representing one of the most intimate moments of their father's life, should
fall into private hands for purposes of profiteering. That's not something
they're going to allow to happen."

     Malcolm X, one of the most controversial and influential black leaders
of the 1960s, was immortalized by his best-selling "Autobiography of Malcolm
X." He has been the subject of a Hollywood movie, and his picture is
currently on a U.S. postage stamp.

    The faux-leather book, which --contains 146 pages crammed with names of
supporters, friends and such personalities as actor Ossie Davis, was last
seen publicly as a piece of evidence in the trial of three men convicted of
assassinating the Muslim leader in February 1965.

     Morgan said Butterfield & Butterfield's Los Angeles office was
approached a few months ago by a collector who wanted them to handle the
sale of the book and provided an authenticating letter from the man he said
he bought it from.

     The man expressed great admiration for Malcolm X in his letter, and
said he had purchased the book "after it was discarded," Morgan said.

     "It was my understanding that after 25 years, the court personel [sic]
purged their court cases," the man wrote. "I felt privileged to own this
small piece of history that almost was lost forever."

     But the Malcolm X file was not "purged." Like most cases in New York
City, it was merely filed away, and authorities are still trying to find out
how the book made it to the auction block.

     G. Foster Mills, the managing attorney for the counsel of the city of
New York, which reportedly had evidence that it was stolen, did not return
calls for comment.

     A spokesman for the Manhattan district attorney's office said the
Malcolm X file should have been stored at its archives for 25 years after
the trial, then moved to the Municipal Archives, though sometimes police
retain key bits of evidence.

     Kenneth Cobb, director of the Municipal Archives, said the only trace
of the book in the file is an empty envelope classified as "1965 Red Diary
With Three Bullet Holes." It is marked "Personal Property of Malcolm X
Little"--adding a surname that Malcolm X discarded as a name bestowed by
slave owners.

     He said it would be "extremely unusual" for that type of evidence to be
sent to Municipal Archives and he does not know if the book arrived with the
file in 1993.

     "It clearly belonged to Malcolm X and should have gone back to the
family in 1965," Cobb said.

   New York City Police Department Inspector Michael Collins said the book
was entered as evidence in 1965. Usually such evidence is held by the
district attorney's office and returned to the family, he said.

     "I'm willing to bet it never came back to this department after the
trial," Collins said.

     Morgan said there is a possibility that the auction legal staff will
conclude that the collector has "clear title" to the book--even if the
family contests that claim.

     In that case, though it would be disputed, "it would be his right to
sell, and we would proceed to auction," Morgan said. "If we did auction it,
it would be up to the bidder to decide what to do with it."

     The book is to be displayed along with dozens of other items at the
auction house's Los Angeles showroom through the weekend.

     So far, Morgan said, three wealthy collectors from the East Coast have
contacted the auction house and said they would like to buy the book just to
give it back to the family, whose surname is Shabazz. Its worth is estimated
at up to $50,000.

   "Wouldn't that be a nice little stroke?," Morgan said. "Either way, it
wouldn't be surprising to me to find that the Shabazz family would regain"
the book.

     Joseph Fleming, the attorney for the family, was not heartened.

     "We appreciate that type of offer, but we would not like to see anyone
profit from the theft of the [book]," Fleming said. "Malcolm X represents
one of the great figures of the 20th century. I think there is a great deal
of interest that a piece of history could be stolen in this way and then
find itself across the continent up for sale at an auction house.

     "No matter how many levels Butterfield might be removed from that
process, it's still stolen property," he said. "We'll see what kind of
reputation they want to maintain by how they respond."

     Fleming said he is fielding numerous calls from people who want to
start letter-writing campaigns or help pay the legal costs of suing the
auction house.

     The auction house, too, has received calls from angry citizens,
spokesman Morgan said.

     Morgan says callers have listened to talk radio shows that portray
Butterfield & Butterfield as "the bad guy."

     When one woman told him that "as an African American woman," he began
his reply with: "As an African American man . . ."

     "I told one woman, 'It's a good thing Butterfield is marketing the
property,' " he said. "Had this been sold privately, no one would have ever
known."

Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved